Testing branch proposal

Nathan Coulson conathan at conet.dyndns.org
Sun Jul 4 22:02:49 PDT 2004


> Jeremy Utley wrote:
>> Greetings, dev readers!
>>
>> Now that GCC 3.4.1 has been released, the time I believe has come to
>> consider cutting LFS to a testing branch.  However, the question is,
>> what to bring with us to the testing branch.  Here's the new things
>> we're looking at for the new LFS 6.0 testing branch, from what I can
>> see:
>>
>> 1) Kernel 2.6
>> 2) NPTL
>> 3) Newer Glibc version
>> 4) GCC 3.4.x
>> 5) Udev
>> 6) Hotplug
>
> Also, readline has been added. This was supposed to be addressed
> before unstable went to testing (seemed to have much controversy
> last time the subject came up).
>
> --
> Randy
> --

and the binutils version issue.  I dont remember any discussion on moving
to 2.15.x.x, except that it was required for gcc at one time.



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list