LFS-6.0 print process

Ian Molton spyro at f2s.com
Wed Jul 7 11:53:18 PDT 2004


On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 19:44:50 +0100
Matthew Burgess <matthew at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:

> > Too soon. there has been no testing.
> 
> Not true.  A lot of people have been testing, and following progress in
> be-lfs on IRC.  Once this branch has been created then it'll be more
> generally acceptable to more folks on this list to begin testing.  I
> don't foresee many problems at all, if current experience on IRC is
> anything to go by.  What is the point of the 'testing' branch if not to
> encourage folks to test? 

No I was referring to the print fork - that should come from stable!



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list