LFS-6.0 print process
spyro at f2s.com
Wed Jul 7 11:53:18 PDT 2004
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 19:44:50 +0100
Matthew Burgess <matthew at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> > Too soon. there has been no testing.
> Not true. A lot of people have been testing, and following progress in
> be-lfs on IRC. Once this branch has been created then it'll be more
> generally acceptable to more folks on this list to begin testing. I
> don't foresee many problems at all, if current experience on IRC is
> anything to go by. What is the point of the 'testing' branch if not to
> encourage folks to test?
No I was referring to the print fork - that should come from stable!
More information about the lfs-dev