LFS-6.0 print process
conathan at conet.dyndns.org
Wed Jul 7 15:41:19 PDT 2004
>> Well, I've created the testing branch at
>> svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/branches/testing. So far I've
>> removed hotplug. So, still to do are:
>> 1) Confirm with BLFS that ed can migrate across
>> 2) Confirm with BLFS that net-tools can migrate across
>> 3) On a "yes" to 2) apply Jim's iproute2 patches to both books
>> If none of the above 3 get done in time, I don't see them as
>> show-stoppers, they're relatively minor in comparison to the other
>> changes that 6.0 brings with it. However, they are "nice to haves"!
>> I'm trying to get render-lfs-book.sh to produce an online copy for
>> everyone to access but for the time being folks will just have to
>> download the copy at
>> or do an svn checkout and render it themselves of course.
>> As mentioned before, I don't foresee too many technical problems with
>> the testing branch. However, there is a *lot* of documentation to put
>> in still. I'll attempt to get this into the branch by the end of this
> The next iteration of the LFS Bootscripts [which shall be 2.1.3] currently
> have the following changes
> a) The network bootscript now uses source within subshells, to obtain the
> value of the ONBOOT variable
> b) added -depth to the find command in the cleanfs script
> c) moved the hotplug script from lfs/init.d to contrib/init.d.
> d) ifup and ifdown now have the option of being utilized by hotplug [if
> ONHOTPLUG is defined in ifconfig.eth0]. This has no value to the testing
> branch at this time. (I decided to keep it, as nobody said otherwise, and
> prevents hotplug from doing whatever it pleases with network interfaces
> unless you want it to)
> e) Added an additional check to udev. If it is unable to mount /dev as a
> ramfs, print a pretty message, and halt the computer. (Currently
> untested, but committed).
> Further changes I wish to commit
> Configuring the network interfaces via the interface name, instead of an
> arbritary name. [aka, all protocols on eth0 should be in ifconfig.eth0].
> There are 2 systems for consideration,
> a) SERVICE="static,ipx,pppoe" #[with or without ,'s].
> [all variables that'll be utilized by the static, ipx, or pppoe
> scripts included]
> Patches are on lfs-dev, and would need some testing to verify.
> Organized simular to grub's menu'lst, and the different services can be
> better organized. A bit of extra scripting to implement, there was a
> basic example on how this could be done on lfs-dev, but it was
> psedocode. (Anything above the first SERVICE= line would be set for all
> I would prefer b, if we even want this for the 2.1.3 release. (Depends on
> the testing timeline).
> Someone on blfs-dev wanted to migrate the createfiles configuration file
> from a file to a directory, I have not seen any further discussion on
> that. (hint, now's the time to speak up if you like)
Also Matthew, if you wish any further changes to the lfs-bootscripts, I
have time to work on them on thursday.
More information about the lfs-dev