LFS-6.0 print process

Jeroen Coumans jeroen at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Jul 8 02:48:30 PDT 2004


Matthias Benkmann said the following on 08-07-2004 11:30:
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:27:49 -0500 DJ Lucas <dj at linuxfromscratch.org>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>>but if hotplug was never deemed relatively stable, then it 
>>never should've touched testing. 
> 
> 
> But the way it is going to happen is that rather than certain changes
> being merged from unstable to testing is that at certain points in time
> unstable will simply *become* testing.
> That's simply because the people responsible who've often discussed the
> changes to unstable extensively won't be willing to go through everything
> again piecemeal, especially not on lfs-dev, where all the conservative
> naysayers will complain about bloat and immature packages being put into
> the book.

You hit the nail on the head (dutch expression)! And the recent removal 
of hotplug in testing and the various problems with udev, which 
Alexander wished to solve, are all proof that the above method is flawed 
and that testing should be created from stable instead of the other way 
around.

-- 
Groeten/Greetings,
Jeroen Coumans
{faq,website}@linuxfromscratch.org
www.jeroencoumans.nl



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list