LFS-6.0 print process

Ian Molton spyro at f2s.com
Thu Jul 8 03:25:07 PDT 2004


On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:30:45 +0200
Matthias Benkmann <msbREMOVE-THIS at winterdrache.de> wrote:

> 
> > but if hotplug was never deemed relatively stable, then it 
> > never should've touched testing. 
> 
> But the way it is going to happen is that rather than certain changes
> being merged from unstable to testing is that at certain points in time
> unstable will simply *become* testing.
> That's simply because the people responsible who've often discussed the
> changes to unstable extensively won't be willing to go through everything
> again piecemeal, especially not on lfs-dev, where all the conservative
> naysayers will complain about bloat and immature packages being put into
> the book.

WTF ?



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list