LFS-6.0 print process
spyro at f2s.com
Thu Jul 8 10:42:22 PDT 2004
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 18:58:14 +0200
Jeroen Coumans <jeroen at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> I just don't
> want it to become a backdoor through which highly controversial
> changes (such as udev, hotplug) get ported into testing/stable without
Since its required that changes going into testing be discussed, I think
thats a moot point.
The problem right now is that testing doesnt exist, so it has to be
what *should* have happened is that testing and unstable should have
forked simultaneously and gone on from there.
More information about the lfs-dev