LFS-6.0 print process

Ian Molton spyro at f2s.com
Thu Jul 8 10:42:22 PDT 2004

On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 18:58:14 +0200
Jeroen Coumans <jeroen at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:

>  I just don't 
> want it to become a backdoor through which highly controversial
> changes (such as udev, hotplug) get ported into testing/stable without
> discussion.

Since its required that changes going into testing be discussed, I think
thats a moot point.

The problem right now is that testing doesnt exist, so it has to be

what *should* have happened is that testing and unstable should have
forked simultaneously and gone on from there.

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list