LFS-6.0 print process
conathan at conet.dyndns.org
Thu Jul 8 11:59:18 PDT 2004
> Anderson Lizardo wrote:
>> On Wednesday 07 July 2004 18:38, Nathan Coulson wrote:
>> I'm not sure if other *sh accept this syntax but bash has arrays. this
>> you to do something like:
>> IMHO, it's still human-readable :)
> IIUC, that's really no different than the one originally proposed by
> Alexander on blfs as far as presentation is concerned (which
> coincidently I still like). I think one point was not to be forced to
> add a number so that installation instructions could continue to be
> generic. Please correct me if I am wrong.
> -- DJ Lucas
yep, that's why I was hoping for other options.
I dont think I'll include this work for the 2.1.3 release, but right after.
More information about the lfs-dev