conathan at conet.dyndns.org
Sun Jul 11 15:19:28 PDT 2004
you were supose to take of the "was" part in the subject...
> Nathan Coulson wrote:
>>> static IP Routes, I dont know what the progress on this is, but kevin
>>>had a nice patch earlier. [I admit, I dont know if anyone ever played
>>>with it]. I would like to combine this with the proposed changes to
>>>make ifconfig.eth0 a optional directory, and it could probably wait for
>>>the next release.
>> pending, it would be a replacement for setting the gateway command in
>> ipv4-static script.
> Sounds good.
>>> ifconfig.eth0 as a directory.
>> it was named IFCONFIG. BLFS will have to be updated for the testing
>> release. Having ifconfig.eth0 as a directory is now an option, and will
>> probably require 2 files under the directory for static routing, if we
>> decide to get rid of GATEWAY= line.
> Rock on!!!! Glad to see it done! Will a directory be used for LFS by
> default, or will the option be presented to the user? Reason I ask is
> that BLFS text will need updating as well, and the new instructions will
> depend on which is used as LFS's default.
> -- DJ Lucas
I am not sure, yet. I would like to see it as a directory in LFS, as it
gives us the opportunity to use kevin's static route service instead of
the GATEWAY= line. (Which is not in the bootscripts yet, BTW).
it's up to matt.
More information about the lfs-dev