conathan at conet.dyndns.org
Sun Jul 11 22:34:29 PDT 2004
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 11:33:40PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> Seriously, if everyone involved in the discussion is happy with the
>> solution(s) put forward (I'm thinking namely Archaic, DJ, Nathan, Kevin,
>> Bryan) then I'm happy for them to go into testing.
> I don't know how I'm really part of this as my question was unrelated,
> but I'll throw my 2 bits in... while most people will likely be setting
> up one interface and one service, the directory structure is a clean
> method of handling most needs (regardless of how many people even need
> them) with one generic set of scripts. That sounds like a win/win to me.
BTW, who is going to make the book changes? With the team sortof well,
changing around, I am not sure who's watching the bootscript changes.
just post a list of required textual changes?
More information about the lfs-dev