matthew at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Jul 12 11:44:58 PDT 2004
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:34:29 -0600 (MDT)
"Nathan Coulson" <conathan at conet.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 11:33:40PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >> Seriously, if everyone involved in the discussion is happy with the
> >> solution(s) put forward (I'm thinking namely Archaic, DJ, Nathan,
> >Kevin,> Bryan) then I'm happy for them to go into testing.
> > I don't know how I'm really part of this as my question was
> > unrelated, but I'll throw my 2 bits in... while most people will
> > likely be setting up one interface and one service, the directory
> > structure is a clean method of handling most needs (regardless of
> > how many people even need them) with one generic set of scripts.
> > That sounds like a win/win to me.
> > --
> > Archaic
> BTW, who is going to make the book changes? With the team sortof
> well, changing around, I am not sure who's watching the bootscript
> just post a list of required textual changes?
That would be *very* useful, yes.
More information about the lfs-dev