Jeremy Utley jeremy at
Mon Jul 12 13:52:27 PDT 2004

Nathan Coulson wrote:

>>I obviously don't want to offend anyone here (or maybe it's too late for
>>that? :)).
>>has a comprehensive list of people to acknowledge, although I'd hesitate
>>to say that not all of them have a *direct* influence on the LFS book.
>>As such is it still fitting to mention them in the (printed) book
>>itself? e.g. members of the ALFS, BLFS and HLFS projects are mentioned
>>I realise that mentioning this will touch some nerves as it begins to
>>treat the LFS Project and the LFS Book as separate entities. I
>>personally think that the LFS Book should contain acknowledgments for
>>LFS Book leads, editors and supporting staff (website - including
>>mirrors, FAQ, translators).  Other folks should (quite rightly) be
>>acknowledged, but in the particular books that they've contributed to.
>>This may mean that someone gets mentioned in more than one
>>place(particularly the mirror maintainers), but I don't see a problem
>>with that.
>>Thoughts? Comments?
>makes sense to me.  [no clue where I would fit in though]

In all technicality, you are now an LFS editor at this point, so you 
would definately fit in as one of those who is acknoledged in the LFS book.


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list