lfs-bootscripts-2.2.0 released, ready for lfs-testing branch
conathan at conet.dyndns.org
Mon Jul 12 14:04:43 PDT 2004
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:52:15 -0600 (MDT)
> "Nathan Coulson" <conathan at conet.dyndns.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:27:36 -0600 (MDT)
>> > "Nathan Coulson" <conathan at conet.dyndns.org> wrote:
>> >> perfect. now what?
>> > Dunno, you tell me :) What's still outstanding that you feel is
>> > either a) necessary or b) nice-to-have for the testing branch? The
>> > only things I can think of are static routing and directory based
>> > configuration. How much work is involved/left to do on these? Is
>> > it feasible for either or both of these to go in to this release?
>> > Cheers,
>> > Matt.
>> > --
>> I think you got them all. static-route is whenever kevin reposts his
>> work, and directories are up to whoever's a book editor, who thinks it
>> is useful. (Both could probably go in together).
>> I got to figure out XML... [I know it's probably easy but still]
> If the directories stuff is just that snippet you posted before (i.e.
> effectively moving /etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.eth0 to
> /etc/sysconfig/network-devices/ifconfig.eth0/ipv4 then I can do that
> easily enough. If it's more involved, then just let me or one of the
> other editors (there are still some left aren't there!) know exactly
> what needs to change.
literally, that is the only change for directory based configuration.
If we do static routes, it'll be just a second file in that directory, but
you dont have to worry about that at this particular minute.
More information about the lfs-dev