spyro at f2s.com
Tue Jul 13 02:21:26 PDT 2004
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:35:04 -0700
Jeremy Utley <jeremy at jutley.org> wrote:
> Simply, the community needs to come back together, and work together, as
> a team. Drop personal agendas, and work for the betterment of LFS as a
Im beginning to wonder if we should have just two development trees, unstable and stable, and just consider stable to be ALWAYS stable.
That said, the next thought I have is that we should have as many trees as we like + a stable one.
I think the real solution is, as Jeremy says, to work better as a team. DONT fight over what goes into a given release.
we need a release maintainer for stable, who should *dictate* what goes in (no harm in debating it but he should have the final word).
unstable, by definition, cant have a release maintainer - it never 'releases' as such anyway.
and I think the 'You didnt build by the book, go away' attitude doesnt work. There may be no practical advice available, but we can learn from the failure...
More information about the lfs-dev