maerten.sebastien at laposte.net
Tue Jul 13 04:11:13 PDT 2004
Ian Molton wrote:
> we need a release maintainer for stable, who should *dictate* what goes in (no harm in debating it but he should have the final word).
+1 for *dictate*. Maybe having a detailed roadmap / progress reports
would help avoiding discussions. More "drastic" methods gcc-like would
> unstable, by definition, cant have a release maintainer - it never 'releases' as such anyway.
> and I think the 'You didnt build by the book, go away' attitude doesnt work. There may be no practical advice available, but we can learn from the failure...
+1 here too. Maybe the "Your distro, your rules" should be changed too
since LFS is not a distro and confusion is often done. On this subject,
we could have an "official" lfs distro as a separated project, which
would help keeping people (like Alexander) around.
Just my two (euro)cents.
More information about the lfs-dev