spyro at f2s.com
Wed Jul 14 03:38:29 PDT 2004
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 13:33:14 +1000
Zeplin <zeps at ihug.com.au> wrote:
> > I agree. IRC moves *far* too fast for anything but unstable and
> > covers too few people to be representative.
> Sure irc moves fast be-lfs was done useing irc as the communication
> medium. But then again, targets were made and achived then revised and
> achived, Much like a meeting for a company/board of directors.
> Learn from buistness.
Businesses often set up 'release teams' to polish products.
IRC is fine for unstable, which is very good (I run it) but it needs a
slower more thought out development process if it is to become stable.
More information about the lfs-dev