/srv?

Mark A. Friedman mafmailbox at earthlink.net
Thu Jul 15 03:02:41 PDT 2004


Dagmar d'Surreal wrote:

> (meaning no distribution has ever used it before to my knowledge),

FYI, SuSE has been using /srv for ftp, httpd and other server data 
increasingly, at least, for its last two or three distributions.

There was lengthy discussion on the FHS mailing lists when (and before) 
/srv was added to the standard and opinions were sought from major 
distributions.  For example, see 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-lsb/2003/11/msg00009.html and 
http://bugs.freestandards.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16 for 
some of that discussion.

/srv was a step towards specifying a location for server data without 
dictating how that data should be further partitioned, and while 
acknowledging that it would be unreasonable to mandate moving 
/var/spool/mail into /srv as part of the standard.

I'd suggest that sticking close to the FHS standard, including /srv, and 
referencing the FHS standard, educates a LFS reader as to the expected 
locations of files in distributions that stick to the standard.

Perhaps _the_ major educational advantage I see in LFS is the piecewise 
building of the system, which gives one an opportunity to ask in detail 
why this or that has been added to the system each step along the way 
(including an empty /srv directory).  I could educate myself equally 
with many other distributions but the initial hurdle in breaking down, 
say, the minimal gentoo installation and its build scripts, is greater 
than the effort needed to examine the building of an LFS system (even if 
I don't actually build the system).

--
Mark A. Friedman



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list