[rfc] use ext3 instead of ext2
maerten.sebastien at laposte.net
Fri Jul 16 00:21:33 PDT 2004
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> I'm away for a long weekend now, so it
> gives you all a chance to contribute your thoughts on this without my
> overseeing you :)
Yesterday, I read this:
Which IMHO seems to imply that the last point preventing replacement of
ext2 by ext3 is performance with low latency work. However, it does not
seem to be a big deal and moreover it is currently worked out.
From this, I would say go for ext3.
Thank you for raising this point, have a nice WE.
More information about the lfs-dev