Comments for LFS-Book V6.0-testing-200407022

Joel Miller cheeziologist at
Sat Jul 31 07:12:07 PDT 2004

> LFS needs searchable archives.  Going through the archives on the web is 
> painful at best.  The alternative, downloading the archive and 
> viewing/searching in {vi,insert editor of choice} is our only real 
> alternative.  Google doesn't seem to search the LFS lists like it does 
> some others.
Firstly, LFS does have searchable archives at and you can even now specify 
which list you want to search on specifically. Secondly, Google does 
search the LFS lists as I've done it several times. I don't mean to be 
hostile (as it sounded re-reading this post), but I just want to point 
out that this part of your post was incorrect.

Registered LFS User 6929
Registered Linux User 298182

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list