Makefile for LFS 5,1

Christophe Devine devine at
Sat Jun 12 05:34:18 PDT 2004

Michael Kipper <mkipper at> wrote:

> If anyone has any comments about this, or has done this kind of thing 
> before, let me know. I liked this method better than one huge Makefile 
> because it allowed for easier maintenance and package upgrading. I have 
> yet to implement an easy way of package management, though. Right now 
> you have to make sure all dependencies are met yourself.

I prefer this method too - it's just simpler to upgrade one single
package without having to meddle with one huge file. How about making
your scripts available on some http server ?


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list