Makefile for LFS 5,1
devine at iie.cnam.fr
Sat Jun 12 05:34:18 PDT 2004
Michael Kipper <mkipper at rogers.com> wrote:
> If anyone has any comments about this, or has done this kind of thing
> before, let me know. I liked this method better than one huge Makefile
> because it allowed for easier maintenance and package upgrading. I have
> yet to implement an easy way of package management, though. Right now
> you have to make sure all dependencies are met yourself.
I prefer this method too - it's just simpler to upgrade one single
package without having to meddle with one huge file. How about making
your scripts available on some http server ?
More information about the lfs-dev