make check discussion

Matthew Burgess matthew at linuxfromscratch.org
Thu Jun 17 11:33:37 PDT 2004


On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:09:33 -0400
Joel Miller <cheeziologist at mail.isc.rit.edu> wrote:

> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 June 2004 03:53 am, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > 
> >>It seems to me that the discussion should be where  the checks are
> >>recommended (i.e., Chapter 6) and the pointers to the discussion
> >>should be in Chapter 5 where is says "You can do it, but we don't
> >>recommend it."
> >>
> >>  -- Bruce
> > 
> > 
> > I agree.  The current setup is awkward.
> > 
> I agree as well.

As do I.  Editors: If you get to this before I do, fine.  Otherwise
consider me dealing with it.

Cheers,

Matt.



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list