Proposed Change - RFC - net-tools to iproute2

Jason Gurtz jason at
Mon Jun 28 08:53:40 PDT 2004

On 6/27/2004 19:25, Matthew Burgess wrote:

> 2) Dependency on Berkeley DB
> * If we suppress the building of `arp` then we no longer require db. 
> I'd assume that ARP isn't too common a requirement for a base system,
> and that you'll know if you need it.  As long as we point to BLFS (and
> BLFS has instructions for rebuilding iproute2 with db support) then I
> don't see this as an issue.

Isn't there a kernel arpd available for those people that need it anyway?



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list