5.1 Release Criteria
conathan at conet.dyndns.org
Tue May 4 14:17:08 PDT 2004
> On Tue, 4 May 2004 14:11:49 -0600 (MDT)
> "Nathan Coulson" <conathan at conet.dyndns.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 4 May 2004 14:04:01 -0600 (MDT)
>> > "Nathan Coulson" <conathan at conet.dyndns.org> wrote:
>> >> 2.0.5 is 2.0.4 with the heimdal script in it (AKA, no changes when
>> >it> comes to LFS). It should be added for BLFS's sake.
>> > Ack, why are BLFS scripts in a LFS-Bootscript tarball? Sorry if I
>> > missed the previous discussion on this, but doesn't it just create
>> > an unnecessary dependency between the two projects?
>> > Cheers,
>> > Matt.
>> > --
>> Tushar requested it. more or less we have a seperate install target,
>> such as make install-sshd to install the sshd scripts.
>> it's been that way for a couple months now. [since 2.0.2 or .3 I dont
> Fair enough. In the future when we call a package freeze then this will
> apply to the bootscripts package as well, but for now you're free to
> update it on 2 conditions a) It doesn't touch any of the LFS scripts and
> b) The BLFS guys OK the changes to their scripts. I hope you can
> understand the need for some kind of configuration management and change
> control here. Let me know as soon as you're done so I can update the
> book a.s.a.p. If this is to work out I think the BLFS & LFS guys need
> to declare a package freeze at the same time, in case any of their
> packages need new/updated scripts as is the case now AFAIUI.
It has bugged me a bit about releasing new versions of the bootscripts
because of changes to the blfs side of the bootscripts,
perhaps I should split them apart in the future. [but I rather wait until
5.1 is released before someone makes a decision, if that is ok].
More information about the lfs-dev