5.1 Release Criteria

Nathan Coulson conathan at conet.dyndns.org
Tue May 4 15:00:13 PDT 2004


> On Tue, 4 May 2004 15:17:08 -0600 (MDT)
> "Nathan Coulson" <conathan at conet.dyndns.org> wrote:
>
>> It has bugged me a bit about releasing new versions of the bootscripts
>> because of changes to the blfs side of the bootscripts, perhaps I
>> should split them apart in the future.  [but I rather wait until 5.1
>> is released before someone makes a decision, if that is ok].
>
> I would prefer them to be split although I obviously don't want to tread
> on anyone's toes here.  Are there any scripts that are required by both
> projects - i.e. a change in either of the books may require an update to
> it?  If so this may require a little more coordinated effort, but
> certainly less than is currently required by bundling all BLFS scripts
> in the LFS bootscript tarball.  As you said, such a split should only be
> done post-5.1.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt.
>
> PS: I've re-read my response and realise I may have come across as a
> bit harsh.  FWIW, this wasn't my intention at all.

It's ok.  I actually think we both think alike on this issue, [even if I
have not really shown it that well].  I thought the addition for creating
directories in XFree86 was worth it, and I wanted to have the scripts work
with udev as well, so that good ol belfs wouldnt have a fork.





More information about the lfs-dev mailing list