[RFC] Hotplug inclusion

Richard A Downing FBCS richard at 109bean.org.uk
Thu May 6 23:02:51 PDT 2004


Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> Zack Winkles wrote:
> 
>> I'm proposing to include full hotplug support in the LFS book.  That 
>> would
>> imply three new packages: hotplug, pciutils and usbutils (all of which 
>> are
>> negligable in size).
>>  
>>
> The goal of LFS has always been to keep it minimal and have the rest of 
> the stuff in BLFS. IMO, hotplug currently falls into the "Beyond" 
> category. Just the fact that it would be marked optional indicates it 
> should not be in LFS.
> 

So we take autotools out too?  Nothing depends on them, IIRC.

Hotplug makes a significant improvement, and should be in 6.0
+1.

-- 
Richard A Downing FBCS CITP
http://www.109bean.org.uk/



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list