What is LFS anyway?

jeremy at jutley.org jeremy at jutley.org
Sun May 9 00:51:19 PDT 2004


=
> Also, does the 2.6 kernel require udev?  Would it not be safer to stick
> with static devs (as backup in case something screws up) and link to a
> udev hint that puts the bare essentials (like hotplug) in it thus
> satisfying all users with instructions to their needs/desires?
>

Here we go, living in the fscking dark ages again!  It's time to move on -
udev is here to stay - 2.6 may not require it, but 2.7 will.

I'm so sick and fscking tired of people trying to stifle progress!




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list