What is LFS anyway?
bdubbs at swbell.net
Sun May 9 14:52:00 PDT 2004
Bill's LFS Login wrote:
>On Sun, 9 May 2004, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>I would be in favor of expanding Chapter 9 to tell the user *how* the
>>new system can be customized for individual needs. This includes using
>>chroot from the host system until those packages the user needs are
>>installed. Suggested packages to install early for a desktop system
>>would include communication (dhcp client, wget, etc) and X+Window manager.
>With the availability of VT's, I consider X unneeded for a *base*
>platform. Just include gpm, most of BLFS Chapter 3 stuff, and a
>*minimal* browser. That plus network connectivity seems enough to me.
>Think about it: what's the *big* difference between doing X+* in the end
>of Chapter 9 and doing it as the (user chosen) early effort of BLFS? A
>lot in terms of book size, because of dependencies, and little
>conceptually. If the user has the foresight to download BLFS and a
>browser, we can even eliminate the net connectivity rqmt. If the user is
>comfy with CLI, only convenience is lost if no gpm (of course this is
>easily overcome with a text version of books and vi). Wget? A bash-only
>solution was posted many moons ago (inelegant to read, but so what?).
I hope you didn't think I was advocating putting those apps in LFS. I
certainly was not. I was suggesting a method users could use to
continue to build packages that they may want. Chapter 9 could mention
the limitations of the base LFS system and suggest alternative methods
for customizing their new LFS based system. It already has pointers
to BLFS, hints, and other resources.
More information about the lfs-dev