What is LFS anyway?
maerten.sebastien at laposte.net
Mon May 10 11:29:46 PDT 2004
Richard A Downing FBCS wrote:
> I've had another idea.
> If we had a an offical format, individuals and groups could collaborate
> on 'appendix' style, xml-based, rendered to fit-in with LFS,
> 'how-to-make it work in situation-X'.
> Isn't this Hints, I hear you say? But I was thinking of a more 'stamped
> with the LFS approval mark' and matched to the lfs-version. I see hints
> as 'I did this and it worked for me' - which is not quite the same thing.
> That way the book could be bare bones - which will suit one camp; but
> everyone can render a book with the right appendixes for their requirments.
More information about the lfs-dev