Merge BLFS and LFS? [Was Re: What is LFS anyway?]

Zack Winkles winkie at
Mon May 10 14:02:06 PDT 2004

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:57:42PM -0400, Hui Zhou wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 08:47:24PM +0200, S?bastien Maerten wrote:
> >>It's in 6.0.  It's not leaving.  And it will be required from version 2.7
> >>and on.  Static devices will not be deprecated--they will be useless.  You
> >>*cannot* use 2.7 (or 2.8) without Udev.  It's that simple.
> >
> >I personnaly agree with including udev as soon as 2.6 is in (asap), but 
> >I wonder if there will be LFS-Book releases using a 2.7 (unstable?) 
> >kernel... ;)
> To Be at Edge, why not? As long as there are talented developers work 
> on it and interested audience use it. Users with hardware at edge are 
> definitely looking forward to this book branch.

When 2.7 comes out, as long as it has some semblance of stability, you
can count on it being in BE-LFS (yes, it's still alive), as well as all
the cool early userspace stuff that comes along with it.  Fun times.

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list