My plans

Don Smith dss-lfs at cfl.rr.com
Thu May 13 20:38:19 PDT 2004


Jeremy Utley wrote:
> 
> Ed's there because Patch can utilize it in rare cases (very old 
> patches).  Procinfo is useless, IMHO, and autotools, while nice, are 
> certainly not needed for a base LFS install to reproduce itself.  We've 
> since added readline to HEAD for a similar reason, Bash and e2fsprogs 
> can utilize it to provide additional functionality (in the case of 
> e2fsprogs) or to allow for modularity (in the case of bash using 
> external readline rather than internal).

+1 move ed and procinfo to BLFS
	(old and not used, definitely not required)

-1 don't remove autotools
	(they are after all tools commonly used by packages)

-1 readline isn't necessary and should be in BLFS




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list