jeremy at jutley.org
jeremy at jutley.org
Mon May 17 19:54:02 PDT 2004
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 09:45:09PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> >Jeroen Coumans wrote:
> >>That's exactly true. If we can't build LFS-6.0 from LFS-5.1 (or
> >>LFS-5.0 for that matter), then it shouldn't be LFS-6.0.
> >You _can_ build LFS-6.0 from LFS-5.1 or LFS-5.0. You just have to
> >upgrade your kernel, which people (our target audience) already do. If
> >they built LFS-5.0, are you expecting that they have never upgraded
> >their kernel beyond the 2.4.22 that was in that book?
> >Upgrading an existing host to run the 2.6 kernel is not at all
> >difficult, unless people (especially LFS users) are using a
> >configuration that absolutely _requires_ module support (like a
> >strange initrd or something). If they are using a configuration like
> >that, they are going to run into problems booting their new LFS system
> >anyway, unless they know how to deal with those issues. If they know
> >how to deal with those issues, they can upgrade their host to a
> >(non-modular) 2.6 kernel.
> >In fact, upgrading their system to a 2.6 kernel before they start
> >their LFS build is actually a very good thing, IMHO, because they will
> >find out very early on whether their system has any trouble with the
> >2.6 kernel series. If it does, they did not waste their time building
> >a complete system only to find out they can't use it.
> >Finally, the availability of one or two (if not more) LFS-6.0 capable
> >boot CDs makes this even easier to deal with; if they don't want to
> >modify their host, they don't have to.
> If this is the case, then specific kernel build instructions like those
> in Chapter 8 need to be in the beginning of Chapter 5, or perhaps put
> all the way forward to Chapter 4, Final Preparations.
I don't see why we need these at all. There's already documentation on
building the kernel available on TLDP. LFS has always referred to
existing documentation where applicable.
More information about the lfs-dev