modprobe usbcore in bootscripts
conathan at conet.dyndns.org
Mon May 17 23:10:29 PDT 2004
> Nathan Coulson wrote:
>>>>On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:58:56PM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>>>>>Actually, this wrong. /proc/bus/usb itself does not exist until
>>>>>is loaded, so the mount command I proposed may still not work even
>>>>>usbcore getting automatically loaded; if the mount command checks the
>>>>>existence of the mountpoint before asking the kernel about the "usbfs"
>>>>>filesystem type then it will fail.
>>>>What possible reason could someone have for making their always needed
>>>>hardware a module? Build it in the kernel and forget about sounds the
>>>>easiest both to do and for the book to assume.
>>>We must document this assumption if we do it. And there were voices on
>>>the list that we should not tell the user how to compile his own kernel,
>>>and therefore we must not make assumptions.
>>>Alexander E. Patrakov
>> if it helps any, proc, sys, fat, tmpfs would fail for the same reasons
>> you made them modules... [unless they're named tmpfs.ko or something].
> No, because they are named by their names (except isofs.ko, which has
> alias iso9660). usbfs also has an alias named usbcore. The reason of
> failure is _not_ that the usbfs filesystem is not supported without the
> usbcore module, but that the /proc/bus/usb directory does not exist
> without this module.
> To make this clear, I give you two examples below. They assume that
> usbcore is a module.
> This succeeds (if /mnt/usbfs exists), and the module gets loaded:
> mount -t usbfs usbfs /mnt/usbfs
> This fails if the module is not loaded:
> mount -t usbfs usbfs /proc/bus/usb
> I hope this helps you to understand the issue.
> To make things more complicated to you after that, note that kernel
> developers are not consistent. The /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc directory
> exists even if binfmt_misc is a module and is not loaded, therefore this
> command always succeeds and loads this module:
> mount -t binfmt_misc binfmt_misc /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc
> Alexander E. Patrakov
ok, so much for that idea...
I guess this boils down to, should we support people who have such
components as modules. [shudders]. I guess it wouldn't hurt...
I still dont want to mount /proc/bus/usb outside of /etc/fstab, or after
mountfs though. (and dont want to do it earlier, if it is not needed
More information about the lfs-dev