lfs-01 at thewizardstower.org
Sat May 22 14:18:34 PDT 2004
* Bruce Dubbs <bdubbs at swbell.net> [2004-05-22 23:13]:
> Miguel Bazdresch wrote:
> >Adding more logs to the fire: linux 2.2.x meets all requirements. Why
> >are we using 2.4 instead?
> Meets all requirements for what? Usually Linux 2.2 is with an old
> distro. I tried compiling Linux 2.6 on a system with binutils 2.11 (As
> in RH 7.3) and it failed. A distro with linux-2.2, without update,
> won't build LFS 6.
Please see a few messages up the thread; we were talking about using
to decide which packages go into LFS. Building LFS 6 is not listed
Using linux 2.4 can't be justified if criteria are restricted to those
on that wiki page.
More information about the lfs-dev