glibc/ntpl

Matthias Benkmann msbREMOVE-THIS at winterdrache.de
Tue May 25 04:39:48 PDT 2004


On Tue, 25 May 2004 00:27:43 -0700 Jeremy Utley <jeremy at jutley.org> wrote:

> the build, and it would not affect the host requirements.  We'd still 
> need a kernel running on the host that could support NPTL, cause we'd 
> need the binaries built in chapter 6 to work properly.

Do any of the standard tools used during an LFS build use threads (except
for tests)? Doesn't seem likely. Or is an NPTL-enabled glibc incompatible
with non-NPTL kernels even for non-threaded binaries?


MSB

-- 
Dyslexics have more fnu.




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list