jeremy at jutley.org
Wed May 26 01:29:12 PDT 2004
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Jeremy Utley wrote:
>> Is this a problem in HEAD as well? I remember hearing something
>> about this, but I don't know what the fix is. If it's a problem as
>> well in HEAD, then we need to get it fixed, but if it's simply a
>> problem in the b6_0 branch, then it can be safely ignored, because
>> b6_0 is a dead branch at this point.
> This is a problem for HEAD as well, I suppose, because glibc versions
> are identical. However, I can't test it right now.
> I don't commit the LD_LIBRARY_PATH fix because I don't know if it will
> break hosts of some intermediate age (some early gcc3 version with
> libgcc_s.so incompatible with the one provided by gcc3.4.x -- might
> crash some host tools when loaded).
Ryan - you're the toolchain expert here? How to proceed on this one?
Got any words of wisdom?
More information about the lfs-dev