Printed book ready

Matthew Burgess matthew at
Mon Oct 11 00:31:16 PDT 2004

Thomas Reitelbach wrote:
> On Sunday 10 October 2004 16:49, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>>On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 11:23, wrote:
>>>I think that we can create now the branch/6.0/ repository to keep the
>>Not a bad idea. I've made the branch and will make some final edits
>>there like the patches-root entity change and things like that and
>>render the to-be printed LFS book from that branch and send it off
> Hm, i've been a little confused...
> In the past the stable branches were called "b5_0" or "b5_1". So without 
> knowing better i checked out "b6_0". Well, there is such branch, but it is 
> completely outdated from may 2004.
> Now i figured that the name of the current release-branch is "6.0". Is this 
> old b6_0 an error or is this on purpose? It could lead to confusion... (at 
> least it did for me *g*) so i would suggest to remove it from svn.

Heh, see 



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list