Unstable still on linux-libc-headers-126.96.36.199
Kevin P. Fleming
kpfleming at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Sep 6 08:06:19 PDT 2004
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> However, I think the reason was that Jeremy was waiting for Gerard
> to finish the testing edits, then sync unstable to testing. During
> this time, Gerard gave the go-ahead to update a few of testing's
> packages. Then Jeremy got the go-ahead to update unstable and the
> headers package may just have been overlooked.
Actually, I think the 188.8.131.52 libc-headers upgrade in testing happened
_after_ that, so it's just been missed entirely. I don't know why the
official packages mirror has it already, though, but then I don't know
what controls the versions that show up there.
More information about the lfs-dev