vulnerable zlib in testing?
matthew at linuxfromscratch.org
Sun Sep 12 09:42:56 PDT 2004
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:33:34 -0500
Bruce Dubbs <bdubbs at swbell.net> wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >Anyway, I'll leave that for the BLFS crew to argue over.
> The proper way to get these issues addressed is to create a bug in
> bugzilla. Discussion on the lists is appropriate, but to actually
> ensure the issue is addressed, use bugzilla!
Of course, sorry. I see Igor just created one
(http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=949), so I'll
track that for progress. BTW: I'm in the process of producing a more
LFS-patches compliant patch, OK to attach to that bug? The original
didn't appear to have followed the 'diff -Naur' process.
More information about the lfs-dev