vulnerable zlib in testing?

Matthew Burgess matthew at
Sun Sep 12 09:42:56 PDT 2004

On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:33:34 -0500
Bruce Dubbs <bdubbs at> wrote:

> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >Anyway, I'll leave that for the BLFS crew to argue over. 
> >
> The proper way to get these issues addressed is to create a bug in
> blfs 
> bugzilla.  Discussion on the lists is appropriate, but to actually 
> ensure the issue is addressed, use bugzilla!

Of course, sorry.  I see Igor just created one
(, so I'll
track that for progress.  BTW: I'm in the process of producing a more
LFS-patches compliant patch, OK to attach to that bug?  The original
didn't appear to have followed the 'diff -Naur' process.



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list