Bug Found, 6.0-testing-20040910

Jeremy Utley jeremy at jutley.org
Mon Sep 13 15:14:57 PDT 2004


Matthew Burgess wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:16:46 -0600
>Gerard Beekmans <gerard at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 12:27, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Does that mean that we'll have to ship with a vulnerable zlib (bug
>>>#899
>>>)? If so I think the least we can do is put a prominent warning in
>>>the
>>>book.
>>>      
>>>
>>Let me put it this way. The book won't be delayed if packages are
>>changed now. The patch can be added but there isn't going to be
>>additional testing.
>>    
>>
>
>In which case can I ask that _you_ put the necessary changes into your
>working copy, which I assume is the only up to date one around.  I'm jus
>t thinking it'll save you getting any conflicts on your next commit
>is all.  The patch _seems_ sane enough, and has been applied by both
>gentoo & debian at least.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Matt.
>  
>
We also still have the outstanding texinfo segfault problem,  which IMHO 
should be fixed as well.  The patch for that has been tested.

-J-




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list