glibc

Dennis J Perkins dperkins at techangle.com
Tue Sep 14 21:24:50 PDT 2004


I just noticed that as of Aug 3, there is a 2.3.3 glibc tarball at the 
GNU site, but the test version of LFS is using 2.3.4 from CVS.  I don't 
know what the differences are between the two versions are, but I was 
wondering why testing is using 2.3.4.  Is 2.3.3 already that obsolete or 
is there something in 2.3.4 that is essential?

I'm not criticizing this decision.  I'm just curious.




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list