[RFC] Add CrackLib to Chapter 6 LFS
LFS-User at mcmurchy.com
Thu Aug 4 21:39:06 PDT 2005
Archaic wrote these words on 08/04/05 23:32 CST:
> Here is an argument, then: it isn't needed for a base development system
> as proven by 6 years of its absence. There is no valid technical reason
> to include it or exclude it. It's merely a choice.
This can be said for many of the LFS packages. Please provide an
opinion on whether it should be added to the default LFS build.
Mind you, as I've said before, I don't care either way. I just
wish folks would give a yes or no answer. :-)
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 184.108.40.206.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
23:37:01 up 124 days, 23:10, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.17, 0.26
More information about the lfs-dev