Changelog Format

Tushar Teredesai sukucorp at
Wed Aug 17 13:42:24 PDT 2005

On 8/17/05, Richard A Downing <richard at> wrote:
> Over on BLFS-dev we have been changing our changelog format.  In the cut
> and thrust of debate ;-) we discovered that at least two of us didn't
> like the LFS changelog format much.
> I prefer a straight forward chronological list of changes without all
> the sections: Upgraded", "Added" and "Removed".
> I suggest LFS changes to this simplified form, although, as a
> non-editor, I don't really have a vote!  :-)

+1 :) Thanks Richard.

Additionally, if folks do find these fields useful, I propose moving
them below the changelog entries or moving them to a separate page.

Tushar Teredesai
   mailto:tushar at

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list