GCC-4 (more nagging) :-)

Randy McMurchy randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Sun Aug 28 00:01:38 PDT 2005

DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/28/05 01:55 CST:
> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>>From what I can tell from the information you provided (following all
>>relevant links), this is a tough bug to follow. I stopped reading
>>when it was starting to dwell on the specs of ISO standards.
>>I'd sure like to see something that explains it a bit easier.
> Well...I _thought_ I had a box with the affected hardware mentioned in
> the RedHat bug, but I was wrong.  So it doesn't look like I'll get to
> see it either.  I have an S3 card at work that I might be able to use,
> but I don't know what model or anything of that nature...will have to
> see on monday.

Can someone summarize this bug?

You mention an S3 card, yet I compiled Xorg just fine and use the
S3 driver just fine. Please for folks that don't have the time or
patience to read ten thousand mails, summarize what is wrong so that
it can be confirmed or denied.


rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
01:58:00 up 148 days, 1:31, 3 users, load average: 0.22, 0.26, 0.25

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list