GCC-4 (more nagging) :-)

Chris Staub chris at beaker67.com
Sun Aug 28 08:06:02 PDT 2005


Randy McMurchy wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote these words on 08/28/05 01:55 CST:
> 
>>Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>From what I can tell from the information you provided (following all
>>>relevant links), this is a tough bug to follow. I stopped reading
>>>when it was starting to dwell on the specs of ISO standards.
>>>
>>>I'd sure like to see something that explains it a bit easier.
>>
>>Well...I _thought_ I had a box with the affected hardware mentioned in
>>the RedHat bug, but I was wrong.  So it doesn't look like I'll get to
>>see it either.  I have an S3 card at work that I might be able to use,
>>but I don't know what model or anything of that nature...will have to
>>see on monday.
> 
> 
> Can someone summarize this bug?
> 
> You mention an S3 card, yet I compiled Xorg just fine and use the
> S3 driver just fine. Please for folks that don't have the time or
> patience to read ten thousand mails, summarize what is wrong so that
> it can be confirmed or denied.

Do you mean the bug that Greg mentioned in his last message? As far as I 
know, there are 2 known bugs with Xorg and GCC4 - one causes a 
compilation failure, and the other allows it to compile fine but doesn't 
work correctly.



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list