LFS in the Linux Documentation Project

Matthew Burgess matthew at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Jan 5 10:43:05 PST 2005

Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> TLDP still has version 5.0 listed as current.
>> I thought this was a known issue and boiled down to license and 
>> formatting requirements they were forcing on us.  Anyone care to hit 
>> me with a reminderbat (the cluebat's worn out already!)?
> They do have those issues for BLFS and that was one impetus for the 
> recent change to the BLFS license, but I hadn't heard of an LFS issue.

OK, I simply assumed (ouch!) that as BLFS was affected, LFS would be 
too.  Would you mind expanding on those issues so we can assess whether 
LFS will be affected?



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list