jakelly at shtc.net
Mon Oct 3 09:15:34 PDT 2005
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:50:52 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork
<jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
>I had fully intended to leave LFS ... I wasn't able to keep myself away.
Sounds like an addiction.
>Manuel roused my attention with jhalfs
Since we talked last, I improved my diy-linux scripts to do what I
mentioned. Now they're now more closely integrated with the package
data, so you don't have to list specific tarball numbers; in most
cases, only the scriptlet name. And with the new restart checkpoints,
it's easy to restart after a failure.
Also, I changed the name to cblx for "custom built linux" so the name
is project neutral.
>one of the team members here ... suggested that I created this notion of
>leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the comment
>that I 'need help'.
With a little extra development effort, I could adapt cblx to work
with lfs too. But since diy-linux provides what I need, I have little
incentive to undertake that extra work.
Well I see some other posts here with similar offers. So many ideas,
so little time ...
More information about the lfs-dev