[RFC] LFS-6.1.1

Ken Moffat ken at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Oct 14 13:35:36 PDT 2005


On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Matthew Burgess wrote:

> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> 
>>> 4) Do something with the udev configuration vs. /etc/group conflict 
>>> reported in bug 1639.
>>
>>  How about the udev version ?  Should we stick with 056 or upgrade it to 
>> 070 ?  (I seem to remember that something newer than 056 was needed for 
>> newer kernels at some point, but maybe that was only a problem when 
>> booting.)
>
> Well, if we upgrade udev, will that act as a precedent to upgrade all the 
> other packages too?  Or is there a particular bug in 056 that you want to see 
> fixed in 6.1.1?  I can't remember the exact combinations of kernel and udev 
> that play well together/break each other, but I have a feeling if we upgrade 
> either, we'd need to upgrade the other too.
>

  I'm happy to stick with 056, unless it bites me on any of my builds.

Ken
-- 
  das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list