Outstanding issues for LFS-6.2

Jim Gifford lfs at jg555.com
Mon Jun 26 08:12:54 PDT 2006

Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>> Yep, I think #1765 (update LFS license) can be retargetted as it's not a
>> show-stopper and needs to be done properly so will take time.  The
>> current license has served us well enough so far, I think.
> I would really like to get this into 6.2 so the BLFS and LFS books use
> the same license.  I did submit a patch that fixes the book.  The only
> thing that takes time is the decision to do it.  We've been sitting on
> our collective hands on this for over two months.  How long does it take
> to make the decision?
>   -- Bruce
Bruce, I would rather go with.

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list