Finalizing the sanity checks

Archaic archaic at
Tue May 2 10:41:43 PDT 2006

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:01:28PM -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> OK, here's a second go at it:

Looks good. I see one thing, though:

"The most likely reason is that something went wrong with the specs file
amendment above."

s/above// because it isn't relevant on the gcc page.


Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list