Unifying the Udev Rules Packages

Jeremy Huntwork jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue May 23 16:03:26 PDT 2006

Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>> What you have described, Matt, has been tried and has failed.
> I think it's a bit too soon to be saying that it's failed.  LFS has only 
> been using a udev-config tarball, the contents of which come from the 
> LFS svn repo, for a short period of time.

I didn't mean the tarball. I meant the different approaches each project 
took to solving the new udev. This contention started way back when it 
was first discovered hotplug was going to be dropped and LFS and CLFS 
each started to try to work out the new solution. What has failed is, 
not the technical methods LFS uses to use udev, but the assumption that 
LFS should be leading the development and that the other projects will 


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list