Unifying the Udev Rules Packages - My final post on this matter

Tushar Teredesai sukucorp at gmail.com
Tue May 23 16:51:47 PDT 2006


On 5/23/06, Jeremy Huntwork <jhuntwork at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> Jim Gifford wrote:
> > The bottom line is if it's Alex or Dan, it needs it's own repo. With
> > branches for LFS and CLFS, so if we make some changes, then Alex or Dan
> > can merge the changes in.
> >
> > On similar note I talked to DJ about this also, a separate repo for
> > bootscripts, with the same requirements will also need to be setup.
>
> I've never quite understood why BLFS and LFS kept their bootscripts
> separate. They could all be in one package with one Makefile that could
> handle every target.
>

They used to be shared at the begining. Check the archives couple of
years back on why they were separated. AFAIR, something to do with
having to release a new version just for BLFS changes.

-- 
Tushar Teredesai
   mailto:tushar at linuxfromscratch.org
   http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list